Forty-five minutes of the real Chelsea, then three goals in seventeen minutes. The Manchester City defeat doesn’t settle the question of where the BlueCo project is going. The Manchester United and Wembley trips will.
By David Cohen, lifelong CFC supporter
I want to start with the first half, because nobody on Chelsea Twitter is starting there this morning and I think they should.
For forty-five minutes on Sunday afternoon at Stamford Bridge, against the team that has been the most ruthless side in European football for the better part of a decade, Chelsea were arguably the better team. Marc Cucurella had a goal disallowed for offside on fifteen minutes. Cole Palmer lashed an early effort into the side-netting against his old club. Pedro Neto drew a low save from Donnarumma. Manchester City — the Manchester City of Pep Guardiola, Erling Haaland, Bernardo Silva and Rodri, the team six points off the top of the league with a game in hand — were described by one neutral observer as “strangely timid and uncertain of themselves.” They created their first real chance in the thirty-third minute. Chelsea reached half-time goalless and not flattered by the scoreline.
I’m not going to pretend that first half was the whole game. It wasn’t. But I am going to insist that we hold onto it, because what happens next in this article — and what happens next in this season — depends on whether we believe that first half was a glimpse of something real or a forty-five minute hallucination on the way to the inevitable.
The collapse, honestly
The second half was a collapse, and there is no honest version of this article that pretends otherwise. Three goals in seventeen minutes. Nico O’Reilly heading home Rayan Cherki’s cross on fifty minutes to break the deadlock. Marc Guéhi (ex-Chelsea) slotting in his first Premier League goal for City six minutes later, set up by Cherki again. Then, on sixty-three, the moment that will define the match in the highlights for years: Moisés Caicedo dawdling on the ball deep in his own half after a casual pass from Robert Sánchez, getting caught in possession by Jérémy Doku, who clipped the finish inside the near post almost contemptuously. Three goals in seventeen minutes. The crowd at Stamford Bridge went from anxious to silent to angry in the space of a quarter-hour, and that is a difficult arc to watch live.
I am not going to dress up the Caicedo error. It was one of the worst pieces of midfield play any Chelsea midfielder has produced this season, by a player whose price tag and salary make every loose touch a small public scandal. He has had a difficult year and there are reasons for it, but those reasons do not change what happened in the sixty-third minute, and pretending they do would insult the readers of this site. The error was the error. It cost a goal that probably ended the match as a contest.
What I am going to push back on, gently, is the framing that what happened on Sunday was uniquely disgraceful. Three goals in seventeen minutes against Manchester City is not, as a statistical matter, a Chelsea-specific disaster. It is what happens to most Premier League teams most weeks once City find their second-half rhythm. Arsenal lost to Bournemouth on Saturday. Manchester United have been losing to teams they shouldn’t lose to all season. Pep Guardiola’s side, when they get going, are still capable of doing this to almost anyone. The collapse was real. It was also recognisably the kind of collapse that teams much better than Chelsea have experienced this calendar year. Both things can be true.
The pattern is the harder problem
What I am more willing to take seriously is the pattern. Chelsea were competitive against PSG in the first leg in March for around seventy minutes before throwing away a creditable 2-2 draw and losing 5-2. Chelsea were competitive against City for forty-five minutes on Sunday before conceding three in seventeen. There is a shape here that has been visible since the international break, and the shape is: this Chelsea team can produce real football for an hour against elite opposition, and then something gives. Concentration, structure, legs, belief — pick whichever explanation sounds most plausible to you. The fact of the giving-way is the same.
This is the question that the Manchester City defeat does not settle, and that I am not willing to settle on the basis of one match. Are the good things we saw in the first half on Sunday a sign of where this team is going — proof that the players have heart, that the system can work against the best, that the foundation is there? Or is the second half the truer reading — the soft underbelly, the lack of fight, the gap between what this squad can produce in flashes and what it can produce when it actually has to grind out a result?
I genuinely do not know the answer this morning, and I am suspicious of anyone who claims they do. Anyone who watched only the second half and concluded that the season is over is missing forty-five minutes of evidence to the contrary. Anyone who watched only the first half and concluded that everything is fine is missing the seventeen minutes that decided the match. The honest position is that both halves were real, both halves told us something, and we will not know which half told us more until we see what happens next.
The next eleven days are the test
Which brings me to the actual point of this article. In the next eleven days Chelsea play two matches that, taken together, will tell us more about where this season is going than anything else we will see between now and the summer.
First, Manchester United at home in the Premier League. United are wounded, inconsistent, and beatable in a way that they have not been at any other point in the Ferguson-era memory. They are also a team Chelsea must beat to be taken seriously as a Champions League contender for next season. There is no honest path to a top-five finish that does not run through results like this one. A win at the Bridge reframes the City defeat as a setback in a campaign that still has fight in it. A draw is survivable. A defeat — particularly the kind of defeat that follows the now-familiar pattern of competitive-for-an-hour-then-collapse — would be much harder to come back from, both in the league table and in the dressing room.
And then, second, Leeds United at Wembley in the FA Cup semi-final. This is the one. The FA Cup is the only realistic trophy Chelsea have left this season, and the semi-final is the one match that could give the BlueCo project something tangible to point at when the post-mortems start in May. A Wembley win sends Chelsea to the FA Cup final and gives Liam Rosenior, BlueCo, and the entire project a piece of concrete evidence that the work is producing results, even if the league campaign has fallen short. It would mean a season potentially with no European football, no trophy, and no obvious story to tell about what was actually being built. It would make every conversation about Rosenior’s future much harder, and it would make every conversation about the BlueCo recruitment model much harder too.
Three points from the Manchester United fixture and a Wembley win against Leeds, and the picture from Sunday afternoon retroactively becomes very different. The first half against City becomes the seed of something, the collapse becomes a bad afternoon, and the FA Cup becomes the hard-won validation of a project that is finally clicking. Three points or fewer from United and a Wembley defeat to Leeds, and the picture from Sunday becomes the saddest thing you can have in football, which is a glimpse of what could have been on the way to confirmation that it was never actually going to be.
What I’m choosing to do until the 26th
I am not, by nature, a knee-jerk reaction kind of supporter, and I am not going to become one this morning because the second half against City was painful. The honest position right now is patience held with both hands. Watch the next two games carefully. Let them tell us what they tell us. Resist the temptation to settle the question one way or the other on the basis of one half-good, half-disastrous afternoon at Stamford Bridge.
The first half on Sunday was a glimpse. It might have been a glimpse of where this team is going. It might have been a glimpse of where it could have gone if certain other things had been true. The next eleven days will tell us which one is real. Until then, I’m holding both halves in my head at once, refusing to let either one cancel the other out, and waiting.
Up the Blues. Especially on Saturday evening against Manchester United. And especially on the weekend after that at Wembley, because that one matters most of all.
David Cohen is the editor of Crosswinds Daily. His earlier piece on the BlueCo project at a crossroads is available here.
Leave a Reply